Return-Path: <crawfordmrsanita@zohomail.com>
Delivered-To: dfwparty+spam@node612.namehero.net
Received: from node612.namehero.net
	by node612.namehero.net with LMTP
	id Yl2/HFrJDmos+zYAJLeZpw
	(envelope-from <crawfordmrsanita@zohomail.com>)
	for <dfwparty+spam@node612.namehero.net>; Thu, 21 May 2026 02:59:06 -0600
Return-path: <crawfordmrsanita@zohomail.com>
Envelope-to: glopez@gigiscleaning.net
Delivery-date: Thu, 21 May 2026 02:59:06 -0600
Received: from ip87-106-19-251.pbiaas.com ([87.106.19.251]:53891)
	by node612.namehero.net with esmtp (Exim 4.99.2)
	(envelope-from <crawfordmrsanita@zohomail.com>)
	id 1wPzF7-0000000F5zG-1q8Y
	for glopez@gigiscleaning.net;
	Thu, 21 May 2026 02:59:06 -0600
Reply-To: crawfordmrsanita@gmail.com
From: Anita Crawford <crawfordmrsanita@zohomail.com>
To: glopez@gigiscleaning.net
Date: 21 May 2026 08:58:24 +0000
Message-ID: <20260521085824.E8CE842AC07C6E97@zohomail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=14.0
X-Spam-Score: 140
X-Spam-Bar: ++++++++++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "node612.namehero.net",
 has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 root\@localhost for details.
 Content preview:  Dear, I hope you are doing well. I am writing to follow up
    on my previous message and would appreciate your response at your earliest
    convenience. Thank you for your attention. 
 Content analysis details:   (14.0 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                             zen.spamhaus.org was blocked due to usage of an
                              open resolver. See
                             https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/
                             [87.106.19.251 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
  1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
               [Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?87.106.19.251>]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED  RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL
                             was blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#DnsBlocklists-dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [87.106.19.251 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  4.0 SPF_FAIL               SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
                             [SPF failed: Rejected by SPF record.]
  3.0 KAM_DMARC_REJECT       DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the message and
                              the domain has a DMARC reject policy
  0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS       Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
                             Alignment
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             [crawfordmrsanita(at)zohomail.com]
  2.6 RDNS_DYNAMIC           Delivered to internal network by host with
                             dynamic-looking rDNS
  1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO       Reply-To/From or Reply-To/body contain different
                             freemails
  0.7 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL       No description available.
  1.4 SPOOFED_FREEM_REPTO    Forged freemail sender with freemail reply-to
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject:  ***SPAM***  Follow-Up on Previous Message

Dear,

I hope you are doing well. I am writing to follow up on my=20
previous message and would appreciate your response at your=20
earliest convenience.

Thank you for your attention.

Kind regards,
Mrs. Anita Crawford=20